<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: True Group vs. Multi-Life Long-Term Care Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bjfim.com/2007/blog/product-reviews/true-group-vs-multi-life-long-term-care-insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bjfim.com/2007/blog/product-reviews/true-group-vs-multi-life-long-term-care-insurance/</link>
	<description>The Go-To Team for Long Term Care Insurance Brokerage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry J. Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.bjfim.com/2007/blog/product-reviews/true-group-vs-multi-life-long-term-care-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry J. Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bjfim.in-the-works.net/?p=241#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Rosanne:

First, this is an academic conversation. Second, for the group we discussed true group is probably the call; you have a large group (3000+) where the employer isn&#039;t willing to pay a few dollars to get the employees into the game. Generally speaking however, for groups under 500 employees (which is the bulk of employers groups) and where you can get the employer to put a few dollars into a core benefit, multi-life is king! Hope this helps; if not give me a call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosanne:</p>
<p>First, this is an academic conversation. Second, for the group we discussed true group is probably the call; you have a large group (3000+) where the employer isn&#8217;t willing to pay a few dollars to get the employees into the game. Generally speaking however, for groups under 500 employees (which is the bulk of employers groups) and where you can get the employer to put a few dollars into a core benefit, multi-life is king! Hope this helps; if not give me a call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosanneangel</title>
		<link>http://www.bjfim.com/2007/blog/product-reviews/true-group-vs-multi-life-long-term-care-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>rosanneangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bjfim.in-the-works.net/?p=241#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Your article favors multi life but when we talked, you thought group was better for my situation. Any comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article favors multi life but when we talked, you thought group was better for my situation. Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry J. Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.bjfim.com/2007/blog/product-reviews/true-group-vs-multi-life-long-term-care-insurance/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry J. Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 15:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bjfim.in-the-works.net/?p=241#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sandi and I&#039;d like everyone to know that you will be teaching your California Partnership course for us on October 9th at the Woodland Hills Country Club. They can register today on the website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sandi and I&#8217;d like everyone to know that you will be teaching your California Partnership course for us on October 9th at the Woodland Hills Country Club. They can register today on the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

